Botswana vs Ecuador: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
334,743 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
384,884 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
169th
Ecuador rank
168th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Ecuador
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 384,884 current LCU per square kilometre against 334,743 current LCU per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 50,141 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 169th and Ecuador ranks 168th of 185 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 65.14 current LCU per square kilometre 6,391 current LCU per square kilometre 6,326 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 385.66 current LCU per square kilometre 20,754 current LCU per square kilometre 20,368 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 2,551 current LCU per square kilometre 47,180 current LCU per square kilometre 44,629 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 15,509 current LCU per square kilometre 64,473 current LCU per square kilometre 48,964 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 56,085 current LCU per square kilometre 122,525 current LCU per square kilometre 66,440 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 178,279 current LCU per square kilometre 293,715 current LCU per square kilometre 115,436 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 292,411 current LCU per square kilometre 348,569 current LCU per square kilometre 56,158 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 384,884 current LCU per square kilometre against 334,743 current LCU per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Ecuador?
50,141 current LCU per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Ecuador rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 169th and Ecuador ranks 168th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Ecuador: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/">Botswana vs Ecuador: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.