Bangladesh vs Mauritius: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
256.50 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
269.00 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
29th
Mauritius rank
27th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Mauritius
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 269.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 256.50 million current LCU per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 12.49 million current LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 29th and Mauritius ranks 27th of 185 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 1.39 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.37 million current LCU per square kilometre 974,538 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 3.75 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.89 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.14 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 10.44 million current LCU per square kilometre 26.28 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.84 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 26.86 million current LCU per square kilometre 78.45 million current LCU per square kilometre 51.59 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 97.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 179.46 million current LCU per square kilometre 82.24 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 216.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 233.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 17.75 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 269.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 256.50 million current LCU per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Mauritius?
12.49 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Mauritius?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Mauritius rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 29th and Mauritius ranks 27th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Mauritius: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/mauritius/">Bangladesh vs Mauritius: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.