Australia vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Australia
240,444 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
167,712 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
175th
Zimbabwe rank
178th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 240,444 current LCU per square kilometre against 167,712 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 72,732 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 175th and Zimbabwe ranks 178th of 185 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2,139 current LCU per square kilometre 1.15 current LCU per square kilometre 2,138 current LCU per square kilometre Australia
1970s 6,658 current LCU per square kilometre 3.09 current LCU per square kilometre 6,655 current LCU per square kilometre Australia
1980s 22,677 current LCU per square kilometre 6.31 current LCU per square kilometre 22,671 current LCU per square kilometre Australia
1990s 48,830 current LCU per square kilometre 6.45 current LCU per square kilometre 48,823 current LCU per square kilometre Australia
2000s 90,227 current LCU per square kilometre 6.5 current LCU per square kilometre 90,220 current LCU per square kilometre Australia
2010s 157,599 current LCU per square kilometre 57.23 current LCU per square kilometre 157,542 current LCU per square kilometre Australia
2020s 211,936 current LCU per square kilometre 48,251 current LCU per square kilometre 163,686 current LCU per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Australia or Zimbabwe?
Australia, at 240,444 current LCU per square kilometre against 167,712 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Australia and Zimbabwe?
72,732 current LCU per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Zimbabwe rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 175th and Zimbabwe ranks 178th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/zimbabwe/">Australia vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.