Australia vs Canada: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Australia
240,444 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
257,293 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
175th
Canada rank
174th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Canada
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 257,293 current LCU per square kilometre against 240,444 current LCU per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 16,849 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 175th and Canada ranks 174th of 185 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Canada Difference Ahead
1960s 2,139 current LCU per square kilometre 5,193 current LCU per square kilometre 3,054 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
1970s 6,658 current LCU per square kilometre 14,790 current LCU per square kilometre 8,132 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
1980s 22,677 current LCU per square kilometre 41,272 current LCU per square kilometre 18,595 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
1990s 48,830 current LCU per square kilometre 71,744 current LCU per square kilometre 22,914 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
2000s 90,227 current LCU per square kilometre 114,921 current LCU per square kilometre 24,694 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
2010s 157,599 current LCU per square kilometre 172,778 current LCU per square kilometre 15,179 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
2020s 211,936 current LCU per square kilometre 228,765 current LCU per square kilometre 16,828 current LCU per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Australia or Canada?
Canada, at 257,293 current LCU per square kilometre against 240,444 current LCU per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Australia and Canada?
16,849 current LCU per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Canada rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 175th and Canada ranks 174th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Canada: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/canada/">Australia vs Canada: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.