Argentina vs Israel: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
57.61 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
61.70 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
52nd
Israel rank
49th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Israel
020.0M40.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 61.70 million current LCU per square kilometre against 57.61 million current LCU per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 4.10 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 52nd and Israel ranks 49th of 185 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Israel Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 current LCU per square kilometre 573.03 current LCU per square kilometre 573.03 current LCU per square kilometre Israel
1980s 96.79 current LCU per square kilometre 1.34 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.34 million current LCU per square kilometre Israel
1990s 71,637 current LCU per square kilometre 10.91 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.84 million current LCU per square kilometre Israel
2000s 177,631 current LCU per square kilometre 23.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 23.77 million current LCU per square kilometre Israel
2010s 2.30 million current LCU per square kilometre 40.33 million current LCU per square kilometre 38.03 million current LCU per square kilometre Israel
2020s 25.96 million current LCU per square kilometre 54.47 million current LCU per square kilometre 28.51 million current LCU per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Israel?
Israel, at 61.70 million current LCU per square kilometre against 57.61 million current LCU per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Israel?
4.10 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Israel?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Israel rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 52nd and Israel ranks 49th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Israel: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/israel/">Argentina vs Israel: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.