Angola vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Angola
47.14 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo
51.62 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
56th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
54th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Angola
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
020.0M40.0M60.0M199420082023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 51.62 million current LCU per square kilometre against 47.14 million current LCU per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 4.48 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of Congo has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 56th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 54th of 185 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 1.68 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.32 million current LCU per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 9.47 million current LCU per square kilometre 14.70 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.24 million current LCU per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 33.21 million current LCU per square kilometre 39.71 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.50 million current LCU per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Angola or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 51.62 million current LCU per square kilometre against 47.14 million current LCU per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Angola and Democratic Republic of Congo?
4.48 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Democratic Republic of Congo?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Angola and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Angola ranks 56th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 54th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/angola/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/angola/congo-dem-rep/">Angola vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.