Latvia vs Zambia: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita
Latvia
18,750 current LCU per person
in 2025
Zambia
18,858 current LCU per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
158th
Zambia rank
157th
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita over time
- Latvia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 18,858 current LCU per person against 18,750 current LCU per person in Latvia, a difference of 108 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 158th and Zambia ranks 157th of 188 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9,224 current LCU per person | 6,726 current LCU per person | 2,498 current LCU per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 14,893 current LCU per person | 13,435 current LCU per person | 1,458 current LCU per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per capita, Latvia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 18,858 current LCU per person against 18,750 current LCU per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per capita between Latvia and Zambia?
- 108 current LCU per person, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zambia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Zambia rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per capita?
- Latvia ranks 158th and Zambia ranks 157th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.