Croatia vs Zambia: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita
Croatia
19,298 current LCU per person
in 2025
Zambia
18,858 current LCU per person
in 2024
Croatia rank
156th
Zambia rank
157th
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita over time
- Croatia
- Zambia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 19,298 current LCU per person against 18,858 current LCU per person in Zambia, a difference of 440 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 156th and Zambia ranks 157th of 188 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9,246 current LCU per person | 6,726 current LCU per person | 2,520 current LCU per person | Croatia |
| 2020s | 14,164 current LCU per person | 13,435 current LCU per person | 729.6 current LCU per person | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per capita, Croatia or Zambia?
- Croatia, at 19,298 current LCU per person against 18,858 current LCU per person in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per capita between Croatia and Zambia?
- 440 current LCU per person, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zambia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Zambia rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per capita?
- Croatia ranks 156th and Zambia ranks 157th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.