Turkey vs United States: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Turkey
2.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkey rank
107th
United States rank
110th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Turkey
  • United States
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M197019962023

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 2.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre in United States, a difference of 243,650 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Turkey's figure about 1.1 times United States's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1987 it was United States ahead.

Turkey ranks 107th and United States ranks 110th of 173 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Turkey averaged higher in 1 and United States in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turkey United States Difference Ahead
1980s 462,744 constant LCU per square kilometre 909,212 constant LCU per square kilometre 446,468 constant LCU per square kilometre United States
1990s 613,390 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 465,166 constant LCU per square kilometre United States
2000s 873,330 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 611,802 constant LCU per square kilometre United States
2010s 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre 361,829 constant LCU per square kilometre United States
2020s 2.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6,160 constant LCU per square kilometre Turkey

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Turkey or United States?
Turkey, at 2.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre in United States as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Turkey and United States?
243,650 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turkey and United States?
37 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2023.
How do Turkey and United States rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Turkey ranks 107th and United States ranks 110th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turkey vs United States: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/turkiye/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/turkiye/united-states/">Turkey vs United States: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.