East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

East Timor
144,894 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
167,712 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor rank
166th
Zimbabwe rank
164th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • East Timor
  • Zimbabwe
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k200020112023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 167,712 constant LCU per square kilometre against 144,894 constant LCU per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 22,818 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times East Timor's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was East Timor ahead.

East Timor ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 173 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, East Timor averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Timor Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 98,115 constant LCU per square kilometre 77,222 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,893 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 124,156 constant LCU per square kilometre 163,971 constant LCU per square kilometre 39,815 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 138,585 constant LCU per square kilometre 153,263 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,678 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, East Timor or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 167,712 constant LCU per square kilometre against 144,894 constant LCU per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between East Timor and Zimbabwe?
22,818 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Zimbabwe?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do East Timor and Zimbabwe rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
East Timor ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/">East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.