Pakistan vs Seychelles: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Pakistan
53.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Seychelles
50.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
45th
Seychelles rank
46th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Pakistan
  • Seychelles
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M198020012023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 53.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 50.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Seychelles, a difference of 2.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Seychelles's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Seychelles ahead.

Pakistan ranks 45th and Seychelles ranks 46th of 173 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Seychelles in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Seychelles Difference Ahead
1980s 12.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre 217,400 constant LCU per square kilometre Seychelles
1990s 16.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre 20.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre Seychelles
2000s 24.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre 22.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 36.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre 36.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre 91,920 constant LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 50.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre 50.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre 401,675 constant LCU per square kilometre Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Pakistan or Seychelles?
Pakistan, at 53.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 50.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Seychelles as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Pakistan and Seychelles?
2.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Seychelles?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Seychelles rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Pakistan ranks 45th and Seychelles ranks 46th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Seychelles: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/seychelles/">Pakistan vs Seychelles: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.