Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Namibia
206,249 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
167,712 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
162nd
Zimbabwe rank
164th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • Zimbabwe
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k198020012023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 206,249 constant LCU per square kilometre against 167,712 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 38,537 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 162nd and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 173 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 97,995 constant LCU per square kilometre 77,222 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,773 constant LCU per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 156,276 constant LCU per square kilometre 163,971 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,695 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 188,923 constant LCU per square kilometre 153,263 constant LCU per square kilometre 35,660 constant LCU per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Namibia or Zimbabwe?
Namibia, at 206,249 constant LCU per square kilometre against 167,712 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
38,537 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 162nd and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zimbabwe/">Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.