Mexico vs Sweden: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Mexico
10.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
9.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
73rd
Sweden rank
76th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mexico
  • Sweden
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 10.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 9.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

Mexico ranks 73rd and Sweden ranks 76th of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 2.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 4.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre 600,794 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 5.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre 72,088 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 7.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 777,536 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 9.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 775,654 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 9.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre 586,140 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Mexico or Sweden?
Mexico, at 10.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 9.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Mexico and Sweden?
1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sweden?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Sweden rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 73rd and Sweden ranks 76th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Sweden: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/sweden/">Mexico vs Sweden: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.