Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Mauritania
209,960 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
167,712 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
161st
Zimbabwe rank
164th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Zimbabwe
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196419932023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 209,960 constant LCU per square kilometre against 167,712 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 42,248 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 173 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 111,399 constant LCU per square kilometre 77,222 constant LCU per square kilometre 34,176 constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 149,741 constant LCU per square kilometre 163,971 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,230 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 194,769 constant LCU per square kilometre 153,263 constant LCU per square kilometre 41,506 constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Zimbabwe?
Mauritania, at 209,960 constant LCU per square kilometre against 167,712 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
42,248 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Zimbabwe rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/zimbabwe/">Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.