Lesotho vs New Zealand: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Lesotho
947,803 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
131st
New Zealand rank
129th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Lesotho
  • New Zealand
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 947,803 constant LCU per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 105,047 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Zealand ahead.

Lesotho ranks 131st and New Zealand ranks 129th of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 9,115 constant LCU per square kilometre 308,691 constant LCU per square kilometre 299,577 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 49,506 constant LCU per square kilometre 350,418 constant LCU per square kilometre 300,912 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 200,377 constant LCU per square kilometre 427,072 constant LCU per square kilometre 226,695 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 584,926 constant LCU per square kilometre 595,584 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,658 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 892,406 constant LCU per square kilometre 801,308 constant LCU per square kilometre 91,097 constant LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 911,083 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre 111,595 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Lesotho or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 947,803 constant LCU per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Lesotho and New Zealand?
105,047 constant LCU per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and New Zealand rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Lesotho ranks 131st and New Zealand ranks 129th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs New Zealand: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/new-zealand/">Lesotho vs New Zealand: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.