Latvia vs Montenegro: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Latvia
397,594 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro
345,309 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
151st
Montenegro rank
154th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Latvia
  • Montenegro
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199520092023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 397,594 constant LCU per square kilometre against 345,309 constant LCU per square kilometre in Montenegro, a difference of 52,285 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 151st and Montenegro ranks 154th of 173 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 330,823 constant LCU per square kilometre 238,860 constant LCU per square kilometre 91,964 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 327,857 constant LCU per square kilometre 256,783 constant LCU per square kilometre 71,074 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 384,389 constant LCU per square kilometre 311,242 constant LCU per square kilometre 73,148 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Latvia or Montenegro?
Latvia, at 397,594 constant LCU per square kilometre against 345,309 constant LCU per square kilometre in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Latvia and Montenegro?
52,285 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Montenegro rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Latvia ranks 151st and Montenegro ranks 154th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Montenegro: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/montenegro/">Latvia vs Montenegro: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.