India vs Israel: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

India
62.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
54.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
40th
Israel rank
43rd

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • India
  • Israel
020.0M40.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 62.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 54.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 7.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Israel ahead.

India ranks 40th and Israel ranks 43rd of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Israel Difference Ahead
1970s 5.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre Israel
1980s 8.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre Israel
1990s 13.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre 20.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre Israel
2000s 22.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre 29.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre Israel
2010s 40.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre 41.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre Israel
2020s 57.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre 51.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, India or Israel?
India, at 62.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 54.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between India and Israel?
7.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Israel?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do India and Israel rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
India ranks 40th and Israel ranks 43rd of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Israel: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/india/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/india/israel/">India vs Israel: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.