Honduras vs United States: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Honduras
2.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras rank
111th
United States rank
110th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Honduras
  • United States
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

United States currently reports 2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 2.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Honduras, a difference of 25,300 constant LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Honduras ranks 111th and United States ranks 110th of 173 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras United States Difference Ahead
1970s 45,913 constant LCU per square kilometre 603,503 constant LCU per square kilometre 557,590 constant LCU per square kilometre United States
1980s 101,338 constant LCU per square kilometre 801,160 constant LCU per square kilometre 699,822 constant LCU per square kilometre United States
1990s 382,419 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 696,138 constant LCU per square kilometre United States
2000s 1.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 469,572 constant LCU per square kilometre United States
2010s 1.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre 264,267 constant LCU per square kilometre United States
2020s 1.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre 113,892 constant LCU per square kilometre United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Honduras or United States?
United States, at 2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 2.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Honduras as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Honduras and United States?
25,300 constant LCU per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and United States?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Honduras and United States rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Honduras ranks 111th and United States ranks 110th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs United States: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/honduras/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/honduras/united-states/">Honduras vs United States: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.