Guatemala vs Italy: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Guatemala
5.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy
4.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
89th
Italy rank
92nd

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Italy
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 5.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 4.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Italy, a difference of 652,120 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Italy ahead.

Guatemala ranks 89th and Italy ranks 92nd of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Italy Difference Ahead
1970s 1.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre Italy
1980s 1.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre Italy
1990s 1.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre Italy
2000s 2.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre Italy
2010s 4.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre 760,618 constant LCU per square kilometre Italy
2020s 5.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre 445,365 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Italy?
Guatemala, at 5.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 4.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Italy as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Italy?
652,120 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Italy?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Italy rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 89th and Italy ranks 92nd of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Italy: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/italy/">Guatemala vs Italy: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.