Ecuador vs Latvia: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
368,172 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
397,594 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
152nd
Latvia rank
151st

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Latvia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 397,594 constant LCU per square kilometre against 368,172 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 29,422 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 152nd and Latvia ranks 151st of 173 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 186,368 constant LCU per square kilometre 186,036 constant LCU per square kilometre 331.8 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 202,566 constant LCU per square kilometre 274,080 constant LCU per square kilometre 71,515 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 308,077 constant LCU per square kilometre 327,857 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,780 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 343,608 constant LCU per square kilometre 384,389 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,781 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Latvia?
Latvia, at 397,594 constant LCU per square kilometre against 368,172 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Latvia?
29,422 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 152nd and Latvia ranks 151st of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Latvia: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/">Ecuador vs Latvia: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.