Ecuador vs Eritrea: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
368,172 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea
327,195 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2011
Ecuador rank
152nd
Eritrea rank
155th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Eritrea
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 368,172 constant LCU per square kilometre against 327,195 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 40,977 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 152nd and Eritrea ranks 155th of 173 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 179,749 constant LCU per square kilometre 86,327 constant LCU per square kilometre 93,422 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 202,566 constant LCU per square kilometre 79,045 constant LCU per square kilometre 123,521 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 262,818 constant LCU per square kilometre 196,750 constant LCU per square kilometre 66,068 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Eritrea?
Ecuador, at 368,172 constant LCU per square kilometre against 327,195 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Eritrea?
40,977 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eritrea?
19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
How do Ecuador and Eritrea rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 152nd and Eritrea ranks 155th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Eritrea: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/eritrea/">Ecuador vs Eritrea: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.