Dominican Republic vs Tanzania: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Dominican Republic
82.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
102.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
33rd
Tanzania rank
30th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Tanzania
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 102.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 82.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, a difference of 20.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times Dominican Republic's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Dominican Republic ranks 33rd and Tanzania ranks 30th of 173 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 23.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre 28.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 36.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre 45.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 59.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre 75.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre 16.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 77.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre 97.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre 19.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Dominican Republic or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 102.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 82.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Dominican Republic and Tanzania?
20.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Tanzania rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Dominican Republic ranks 33rd and Tanzania ranks 30th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Tanzania: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/tanzania/">Dominican Republic vs Tanzania: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.