Cyprus vs Honduras: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Cyprus
2.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras
2.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
108th
Honduras rank
111th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cyprus
  • Honduras
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M196119922023

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 2.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 2.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Honduras, a difference of 241,360 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 108th and Honduras ranks 111th of 173 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Honduras Difference Ahead
1970s 277,317 constant LCU per square kilometre 53,708 constant LCU per square kilometre 223,608 constant LCU per square kilometre Cyprus
1980s 457,795 constant LCU per square kilometre 101,338 constant LCU per square kilometre 356,457 constant LCU per square kilometre Cyprus
1990s 868,551 constant LCU per square kilometre 382,419 constant LCU per square kilometre 486,133 constant LCU per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 1.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre 467,194 constant LCU per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 1.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 288,931 constant LCU per square kilometre Cyprus
2020s 2.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre 229,078 constant LCU per square kilometre Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Cyprus or Honduras?
Cyprus, at 2.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 2.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Honduras as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Cyprus and Honduras?
241,360 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Honduras?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Honduras rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Cyprus ranks 108th and Honduras ranks 111th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Honduras: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/honduras/">Cyprus vs Honduras: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.