Cote d'Ivoire vs Equatorial Guinea: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
98.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
121.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
31st
Equatorial Guinea rank
29th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Equatorial Guinea
40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M120.0M199620092023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 121.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 98.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 23.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Cote d'Ivoire's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 31st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 29th of 173 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 45.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 55.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 61.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre 104.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre 43.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 88.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 116.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre 27.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 121.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 98.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea?
23.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 31st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 29th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Equatorial Guinea: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/equatorial-guinea/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Equatorial Guinea: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.