Costa Rica vs Uganda: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
739.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
594.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
10th
Uganda rank
13th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Uganda
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 739.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 594.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 144.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 10th and Uganda ranks 13th of 173 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Uganda Difference Ahead
1980s 186.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre 81.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre 104.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 267.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre 128.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre 138.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 377.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre 223.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre 154.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 582.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 402.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre 179.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 698.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre 558.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre 139.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Uganda?
Costa Rica, at 739.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 594.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Uganda?
144.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Uganda?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Uganda rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 10th and Uganda ranks 13th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Uganda: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/uganda/">Costa Rica vs Uganda: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.