Democratic Republic of Congo vs Russia: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Democratic Republic of Congo
4.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Russia
4.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
96th
Russia rank
95th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Russia
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M199220072023

How they compare

Russia currently reports 4.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 4.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 189,090 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 96th and Russia ranks 95th of 173 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Russia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre 179,939 constant LCU per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 2.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre 442,962 constant LCU per square kilometre Russia
2010s 3.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre 525,215 constant LCU per square kilometre Russia
2020s 4.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre 135,048 constant LCU per square kilometre Russia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Democratic Republic of Congo or Russia?
Russia, at 4.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 4.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Democratic Republic of Congo and Russia?
189,090 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Russia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Russia rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 96th and Russia ranks 95th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Russia: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/russian-federation/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Russia: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.