China vs Congo: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

China
7.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
6.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
82nd
Congo rank
85th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Congo
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 7.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 6.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 760,530 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.

China ranks 82nd and Congo ranks 85th of 173 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 976,274 constant LCU per square kilometre 2.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2000s 1.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2010s 4.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2020s 6.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre 550,918 constant LCU per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, China or Congo?
China, at 7.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 6.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between China and Congo?
760,530 constant LCU per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Congo?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do China and Congo rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
China ranks 82nd and Congo ranks 85th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Congo: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/congo-rep/">China vs Congo: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.