Chile vs Mauritius: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Chile
218.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
212.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
23rd
Mauritius rank
24th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Mauritius
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 218.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 212.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 5.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.

Chile ranks 23rd and Mauritius ranks 24th of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 31.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre 41.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 36.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre 48.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre 11.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 64.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre 86.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre 21.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 104.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre 137.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre 33.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 172.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre 197.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre 24.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 212.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 203.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Mauritius?
Chile, at 218.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 212.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Mauritius?
5.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 23rd and Mauritius ranks 24th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.