Central African Republic vs New Zealand: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
1.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
128th
New Zealand rank
129th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • New Zealand
250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M1.5M197019962023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 1.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 213,330 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 128th and New Zealand ranks 129th of 173 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 1.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre 675,497 constant LCU per square kilometre 654,103 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 1.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 801,308 constant LCU per square kilometre 275,723 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 1.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre 255,878 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or New Zealand?
Central African Republic, at 1.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and New Zealand?
213,330 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and New Zealand?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and New Zealand rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 128th and New Zealand ranks 129th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs New Zealand: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/new-zealand/">Central African Republic vs New Zealand: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.