Bolivia vs Peru: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Bolivia
264,513 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
354,135 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
156th
Peru rank
153rd

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia
  • Peru
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 354,135 constant LCU per square kilometre against 264,513 constant LCU per square kilometre in Bolivia, a difference of 89,622 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.3 times Bolivia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Bolivia ranks 156th and Peru ranks 153rd of 173 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 44,302 constant LCU per square kilometre 61,548 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,246 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru
1970s 71,431 constant LCU per square kilometre 91,274 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,843 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru
1980s 81,557 constant LCU per square kilometre 107,582 constant LCU per square kilometre 26,026 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru
1990s 102,170 constant LCU per square kilometre 114,428 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,258 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru
2000s 139,202 constant LCU per square kilometre 157,502 constant LCU per square kilometre 18,300 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru
2010s 214,019 constant LCU per square kilometre 278,367 constant LCU per square kilometre 64,347 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru
2020s 248,764 constant LCU per square kilometre 338,838 constant LCU per square kilometre 90,073 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Bolivia or Peru?
Peru, at 354,135 constant LCU per square kilometre against 264,513 constant LCU per square kilometre in Bolivia as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Bolivia and Peru?
89,622 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Peru rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Bolivia ranks 156th and Peru ranks 153rd of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Peru: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/peru/">Bolivia vs Peru: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.