Belarus vs Kiribati: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Belarus
715,833 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
758,673 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
138th
Kiribati rank
135th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Kiribati
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199220072023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 758,673 constant LCU per square kilometre against 715,833 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 42,840 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kiribati ahead.

Belarus ranks 138th and Kiribati ranks 135th of 173 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 418,747 constant LCU per square kilometre 365,933 constant LCU per square kilometre 52,814 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 579,541 constant LCU per square kilometre 461,477 constant LCU per square kilometre 118,064 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 679,820 constant LCU per square kilometre 673,819 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,001 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Belarus or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 758,673 constant LCU per square kilometre against 715,833 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Belarus and Kiribati?
42,840 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Kiribati rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 138th and Kiribati ranks 135th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Kiribati: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/kiribati/">Belarus vs Kiribati: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.