Argentina vs Canada: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
228,416 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
229,570 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
160th
Canada rank
159th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Canada
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 229,570 constant LCU per square kilometre against 228,416 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 1,154 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 160th and Canada ranks 159th of 173 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and Canada in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Canada Difference Ahead
1960s 59,603 constant LCU per square kilometre 43,466 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,137 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 80,521 constant LCU per square kilometre 68,482 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,039 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 93,977 constant LCU per square kilometre 89,311 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,666 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 121,559 constant LCU per square kilometre 110,632 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,928 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 148,209 constant LCU per square kilometre 146,400 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,809 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 219,007 constant LCU per square kilometre 186,876 constant LCU per square kilometre 32,131 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 213,446 constant LCU per square kilometre 215,836 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,390 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Canada?
Canada, at 229,570 constant LCU per square kilometre against 228,416 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Canada?
1,154 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Canada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Canada rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 160th and Canada ranks 159th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Canada: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/canada/">Argentina vs Canada: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.