Argentina vs Botswana: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
228,416 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana
253,793 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
160th
Botswana rank
157th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Botswana
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 253,793 constant LCU per square kilometre against 228,416 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 25,377 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 160th and Botswana ranks 157th of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Botswana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Botswana Difference Ahead
1970s 83,511 constant LCU per square kilometre 18,795 constant LCU per square kilometre 64,716 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 93,977 constant LCU per square kilometre 32,018 constant LCU per square kilometre 61,959 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 121,559 constant LCU per square kilometre 75,107 constant LCU per square kilometre 46,452 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 148,209 constant LCU per square kilometre 109,739 constant LCU per square kilometre 38,470 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 219,007 constant LCU per square kilometre 188,568 constant LCU per square kilometre 30,438 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 213,446 constant LCU per square kilometre 238,873 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,427 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Botswana?
Botswana, at 253,793 constant LCU per square kilometre against 228,416 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Botswana?
25,377 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Botswana?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Botswana rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 160th and Botswana ranks 157th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Botswana: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/botswana/">Argentina vs Botswana: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 7,020 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.