Burkina Faso vs Dominican Republic: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per capita

Burkina Faso
398,433 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Dominican Republic
368,393 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
46th
Dominican Republic rank
49th

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per capita over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Dominican Republic
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196019922025

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 398,433 constant LCU per person against 368,393 constant LCU per person in Dominican Republic, a difference of 30,040 constant LCU per person.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 46th and Dominican Republic ranks 49th of 177 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 183,500 constant LCU per person 74,006 constant LCU per person 109,494 constant LCU per person Burkina Faso
1970s 191,202 constant LCU per person 98,183 constant LCU per person 93,019 constant LCU per person Burkina Faso
1980s 214,681 constant LCU per person 123,559 constant LCU per person 91,122 constant LCU per person Burkina Faso
1990s 210,170 constant LCU per person 145,384 constant LCU per person 64,787 constant LCU per person Burkina Faso
2000s 265,706 constant LCU per person 190,718 constant LCU per person 74,988 constant LCU per person Burkina Faso
2010s 323,499 constant LCU per person 275,478 constant LCU per person 48,022 constant LCU per person Burkina Faso
2020s 372,839 constant LCU per person 344,003 constant LCU per person 28,836 constant LCU per person Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per capita, Burkina Faso or Dominican Republic?
Burkina Faso, at 398,433 constant LCU per person against 368,393 constant LCU per person in Dominican Republic as of 2025.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per capita between Burkina Faso and Dominican Republic?
30,040 constant LCU per person, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Dominican Republic?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Dominican Republic rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), per capita?
Burkina Faso ranks 46th and Dominican Republic ranks 49th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Dominican Republic: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-capita/burkina-faso/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-capita/burkina-faso/dominican-republic/">Burkina Faso vs Dominican Republic: Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per capita
Unit
constant LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,542 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.