Chile vs Madagascar: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Chile
0.6631 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Madagascar
0.6455 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Chile rank
80th
Madagascar rank
81st

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Chile
  • Madagascar
0246196019922025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.6631 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.6455 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Madagascar, a difference of 0.0176 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Madagascar ahead.

Chile ranks 80th and Madagascar ranks 81st of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 4.29 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 5.97 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.68 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Madagascar
1970s 2.63 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 3.37 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7434 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Madagascar
1980s 1.65 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.47 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1766 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Chile
1990s 1.13 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.55 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4176 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Madagascar
2000s 0.9894 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.27 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2844 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Madagascar
2010s 0.6872 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8146 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1273 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Madagascar
2020s 0.7177 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7499 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0322 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Chile or Madagascar?
Chile, at 0.6631 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.6455 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Madagascar as of 2025.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Chile and Madagascar?
0.0176 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Madagascar?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Chile and Madagascar rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Chile ranks 80th and Madagascar ranks 81st of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Madagascar: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/madagascar/">Chile vs Madagascar: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,103 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.