Burundi vs Least developed countries: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Burundi
1.22 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Least developed countries
0.7011 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Burundi rank
7th
Least developed countries rank
10th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Burundi
  • Least developed countries
0.511.52199320092025

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 1.22 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.7011 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries, a difference of 0.5189 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.7 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Least developed countries ahead.

Burundi ranks 7th and Least developed countries ranks 10th of 172 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 3 and Least developed countries in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1990s 1.78 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.93 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1538 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Least developed countries
2000s 1.7 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.44 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2608 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Burundi
2010s 1.15 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8264 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3202 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Burundi
2020s 1.12 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7342 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3871 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Burundi or Least developed countries?
Burundi, at 1.22 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.7011 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries as of 2025.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Burundi and Least developed countries?
0.5189 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Least developed countries?
29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
How do Burundi and Least developed countries rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Burundi ranks 7th and Least developed countries ranks 10th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Least developed countries: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Burundi vs Least developed countries: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,103 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.