Australia vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Australia
0.7495 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics
0.4764 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Australia rank
45th
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
42nd

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Australia
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
02468196019922025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.7495 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.4764 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 0.2731 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 45th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 42nd of 172 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Central Europe and the Baltics Difference Ahead
1990s 1.4 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.39 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.004 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Australia
2000s 1.24 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2363 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Australia
2010s 0.7401 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6785 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0615 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Australia
2020s 0.7641 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5748 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1893 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Australia or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Australia, at 0.7495 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.4764 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Australia and Central Europe and the Baltics?
0.2731 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Central Europe and the Baltics?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Australia and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Australia ranks 45th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 42nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Australia vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,103 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.