Argentina vs Late-demographic dividend: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Argentina
0.7649 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend
0.5627 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Argentina rank
36th
Late-demographic dividend rank
38th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Argentina
  • Late-demographic dividend
0246196019922025

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0.7649 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.5627 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.2022 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.4 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.

Argentina ranks 36th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 38th of 172 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Late-demographic dividend in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Late-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1990s 1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.26 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2051 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
2000s 1.55 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.07 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4758 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Argentina
2010s 0.9144 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5947 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3197 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Argentina
2020s 0.8571 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5698 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2873 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Argentina or Late-demographic dividend?
Argentina, at 0.7649 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.5627 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Argentina and Late-demographic dividend?
0.2022 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Late-demographic dividend?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Argentina and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Argentina ranks 36th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 38th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Late-demographic dividend: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/late-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/late-demographic-dividend/">Argentina vs Late-demographic dividend: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,103 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.