Puerto Rico vs Singapore: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita

Puerto Rico
30,831 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Singapore
32,698 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Puerto Rico rank
25th
Singapore rank
22nd

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Singapore
010.0k20.0k30.0k196019922025

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 32,698 constant 2015 US$ per person against 30,831 constant 2015 US$ per person in Puerto Rico, a difference of 1,867 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 25th and Singapore ranks 22nd of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 5,586 constant 2015 US$ per person 4,032 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,554 constant 2015 US$ per person Puerto Rico
1970s 9,094 constant 2015 US$ per person 7,063 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,031 constant 2015 US$ per person Puerto Rico
1980s 10,214 constant 2015 US$ per person 10,323 constant 2015 US$ per person 108.51 constant 2015 US$ per person Singapore
1990s 13,025 constant 2015 US$ per person 15,319 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,294 constant 2015 US$ per person Singapore
2000s 17,883 constant 2015 US$ per person 22,112 constant 2015 US$ per person 4,229 constant 2015 US$ per person Singapore
2010s 20,493 constant 2015 US$ per person 26,074 constant 2015 US$ per person 5,581 constant 2015 US$ per person Singapore
2020s 27,769 constant 2015 US$ per person 30,722 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,954 constant 2015 US$ per person Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita, Puerto Rico or Singapore?
Singapore, at 32,698 constant 2015 US$ per person against 30,831 constant 2015 US$ per person in Puerto Rico as of 2025.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita between Puerto Rico and Singapore?
1,867 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Singapore?
62 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2025.
How do Puerto Rico and Singapore rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita?
Puerto Rico ranks 25th and Singapore ranks 22nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Singapore: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/puerto-rico-us/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/puerto-rico-us/singapore/">Puerto Rico vs Singapore: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,114 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.