Hong Kong, China vs Netherlands: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita

Hong Kong, China
36,488 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Netherlands
35,958 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
13th
Netherlands rank
15th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Netherlands
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119932025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 36,488 constant 2015 US$ per person against 35,958 constant 2015 US$ per person in Netherlands, a difference of 530 constant 2015 US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Netherlands ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 13th and Netherlands ranks 15th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Netherlands Difference Ahead
1960s 4,430 constant 2015 US$ per person 15,357 constant 2015 US$ per person 10,927 constant 2015 US$ per person Netherlands
1970s 6,345 constant 2015 US$ per person 18,364 constant 2015 US$ per person 12,019 constant 2015 US$ per person Netherlands
1980s 11,900 constant 2015 US$ per person 21,449 constant 2015 US$ per person 9,550 constant 2015 US$ per person Netherlands
1990s 19,404 constant 2015 US$ per person 25,165 constant 2015 US$ per person 5,761 constant 2015 US$ per person Netherlands
2000s 22,576 constant 2015 US$ per person 31,049 constant 2015 US$ per person 8,473 constant 2015 US$ per person Netherlands
2010s 31,587 constant 2015 US$ per person 32,475 constant 2015 US$ per person 887.96 constant 2015 US$ per person Netherlands
2020s 35,063 constant 2015 US$ per person 34,582 constant 2015 US$ per person 480.95 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita, Hong Kong, China or Netherlands?
Hong Kong, China, at 36,488 constant 2015 US$ per person against 35,958 constant 2015 US$ per person in Netherlands as of 2025.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita between Hong Kong, China and Netherlands?
530 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Netherlands?
57 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Netherlands rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita?
Hong Kong, China ranks 13th and Netherlands ranks 15th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Netherlands: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/netherlands/">Hong Kong, China vs Netherlands: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,114 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.