Hong Kong, China vs Late-demographic dividend: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita

Hong Kong, China
36,488 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend
7,697 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
13th
Late-demographic dividend rank
14th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Late-demographic dividend
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119932025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 36,488 constant 2015 US$ per person against 7,697 constant 2015 US$ per person in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 28,791 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 4.7 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 13th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 14th of 172 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Late-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1990s 20,380 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,055 constant 2015 US$ per person 18,325 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2000s 22,576 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,983 constant 2015 US$ per person 19,593 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2010s 31,587 constant 2015 US$ per person 5,069 constant 2015 US$ per person 26,518 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2020s 35,063 constant 2015 US$ per person 6,908 constant 2015 US$ per person 28,155 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita, Hong Kong, China or Late-demographic dividend?
Hong Kong, China, at 36,488 constant 2015 US$ per person against 7,697 constant 2015 US$ per person in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita between Hong Kong, China and Late-demographic dividend?
28,791 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Late-demographic dividend?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita?
Hong Kong, China ranks 13th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 14th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Late-demographic dividend: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/late-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/late-demographic-dividend/">Hong Kong, China vs Late-demographic dividend: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,114 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.