Bangladesh vs Mauritania: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita

Bangladesh
1,510 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Mauritania
1,407 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
138th
Mauritania rank
139th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Mauritania
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196019922025

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 1,510 constant 2015 US$ per person against 1,407 constant 2015 US$ per person in Mauritania, a difference of 103 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Mauritania ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 138th and Mauritania ranks 139th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 687.49 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,249 constant 2015 US$ per person 561.27 constant 2015 US$ per person Mauritania
1970s 558.06 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,743 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,185 constant 2015 US$ per person Mauritania
1980s 478.26 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,428 constant 2015 US$ per person 949.26 constant 2015 US$ per person Mauritania
1990s 516.92 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,033 constant 2015 US$ per person 516.55 constant 2015 US$ per person Mauritania
2000s 634.27 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,104 constant 2015 US$ per person 470.12 constant 2015 US$ per person Mauritania
2010s 945.89 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,218 constant 2015 US$ per person 272.16 constant 2015 US$ per person Mauritania
2020s 1,356 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,319 constant 2015 US$ per person 37.14 constant 2015 US$ per person Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita, Bangladesh or Mauritania?
Bangladesh, at 1,510 constant 2015 US$ per person against 1,407 constant 2015 US$ per person in Mauritania as of 2025.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita between Bangladesh and Mauritania?
103 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Mauritania?
62 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Mauritania rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita?
Bangladesh ranks 138th and Mauritania ranks 139th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Mauritania: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/bangladesh/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/bangladesh/mauritania/">Bangladesh vs Mauritania: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,114 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.