Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Uganda: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
5.08 % change on previous year
in 2025
Uganda
10.48 % change on previous year
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
4th
Uganda rank
6th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Uganda
-5051015198320042025

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 10.48 % change on previous year against 5.08 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 5.4 % change on previous year.

That makes Uganda's figure about 2.1 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Uganda ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 4th and Uganda ranks 6th of 42 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 3.54 % change on previous year 7.31 % change on previous year 3.76 % change on previous year Uganda
2000s 4.32 % change on previous year 6.12 % change on previous year 1.8 % change on previous year Uganda
2010s 4.38 % change on previous year 5.24 % change on previous year 0.8576 % change on previous year Uganda
2020s 3.41 % change on previous year 5.05 % change on previous year 1.64 % change on previous year Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), annual growth rate, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Uganda?
Uganda, at 10.48 % change on previous year against 5.08 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), annual growth rate between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Uganda?
5.4 % change on previous year, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Uganda?
32 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Uganda rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), annual growth rate?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 4th and Uganda ranks 6th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Uganda: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/uganda/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Uganda: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 8,900 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.