Colombia vs Zimbabwe: External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions portfolio equity
Colombia
1.5
in 2014
Zimbabwe
1.5
in 2014
Colombia rank
35th
Zimbabwe rank
35th
External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions portfolio equity over time
- Colombia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 1.5 against 1.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Colombia ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 59 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.05 | 1.15 | 1.1 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1.1 | 1 | 0.1 | Colombia |
| 2010s | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions portfolio equity, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
- Colombia, at 1.5 against 1.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions portfolio equity between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for external finance, s2 - inflow restrictions portfolio equity?
- Colombia ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as External finance, S2 - Inflow restrictions portfolio equity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.