Georgia vs Sweden: External finance, S1 - Capital inflow restrictions
Georgia
2
in 2014
Sweden
2
in 2014
Georgia rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st
External finance, S1 - Capital inflow restrictions over time
- Georgia
- Sweden
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 2 against 2 in Sweden, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.
Georgia ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 90 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.94 | 1.5 | 0.4375 | Georgia |
| 2000s | 2 | 1.6 | 0.4 | Georgia |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external finance, s1 - capital inflow restrictions, Georgia or Sweden?
- Georgia, at 2 against 2 in Sweden as of 2014.
- What is the difference in external finance, s1 - capital inflow restrictions between Georgia and Sweden?
- 0, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Sweden?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2014.
- How do Georgia and Sweden rank globally for external finance, s1 - capital inflow restrictions?
- Georgia ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as External finance, S1 - Capital inflow restrictions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.