Australia vs El Salvador: External finance, S1 - Capital inflow restrictions
Australia
1.5
in 2014
El Salvador
1.5
in 2014
Australia rank
46th
El Salvador rank
46th
External finance, S1 - Capital inflow restrictions over time
- Australia
- El Salvador
How they compare
Australia currently reports 1.5 against 1.5 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1973 it was El Salvador ahead.
Australia ranks 46th and El Salvador ranks 46th of 90 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.6429 | 0.5 | 0.1429 | Australia |
| 1980s | 1.25 | 0.75 | 0.5 | Australia |
| 1990s | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0.3 | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 1.5 | 1.55 | 0.05 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external finance, s1 - capital inflow restrictions, Australia or El Salvador?
- Australia, at 1.5 against 1.5 in El Salvador as of 2014.
- What is the difference in external finance, s1 - capital inflow restrictions between Australia and El Salvador?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and El Salvador?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do Australia and El Salvador rank globally for external finance, s1 - capital inflow restrictions?
- Australia ranks 46th and El Salvador ranks 46th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as External finance, S1 - Capital inflow restrictions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.