Jordan vs Rwanda: External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

Jordan
501,828 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
461,451 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
18th
Rwanda rank
20th

External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Jordan
  • Rwanda
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197019962023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 501,828 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 461,451 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 40,377 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 18th and Rwanda ranks 20th of 120 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 5,711 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,916 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 3,795 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
1980s 46,776 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 15,542 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 31,235 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
1990s 89,761 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 40,426 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 49,334 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2000s 148,277 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 48,140 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 100,137 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 279,312 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 140,964 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 138,348 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 466,036 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 391,015 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 75,021 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher external debt stocks, total (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Jordan or Rwanda?
Jordan, at 501,828 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 461,451 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in external debt stocks, total (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Jordan and Rwanda?
40,377 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Rwanda rank globally for external debt stocks, total (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
Jordan ranks 18th and Rwanda ranks 20th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Rwanda: External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/external-debt-stocks-total-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jordan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/external-debt-stocks-total-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jordan/rwanda/">Jordan vs Rwanda: External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
132 places, 6,189 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.