Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
38,296 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
37,608 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
85th
Zimbabwe rank
87th

External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k197019962023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 38,296 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 37,608 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 688 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 120 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 370.14 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 687.64 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 317.5 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 1,959 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 5,660 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 3,701 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 4,407 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 11,405 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 6,999 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 7,219 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 12,995 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 5,776 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 33,949 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 26,246 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 7,703 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 36,994 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 36,070 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 923.77 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher external debt stocks, total (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
Burkina Faso, at 38,296 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 37,608 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in external debt stocks, total (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
688 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for external debt stocks, total (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/external-debt-stocks-total-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/external-debt-stocks-total-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
132 places, 6,189 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.