Hong Kong, China vs Sweden: External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth

Hong Kong, China
-22.18 % change on previous year
in 2025
Sweden
-22.45 % change on previous year
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
134th
Sweden rank
135th

External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Sweden
-1.0k-50005001.0k196119932025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports -22.18 % change on previous year against -22.45 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0.27 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sweden ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 134th and Sweden ranks 135th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 6 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 42.97 % change on previous year -20.07 % change on previous year 63.04 % change on previous year Hong Kong, China
1970s 22.92 % change on previous year -17.11 % change on previous year 40.03 % change on previous year Hong Kong, China
1980s 32.9 % change on previous year -22.31 % change on previous year 55.21 % change on previous year Hong Kong, China
1990s 29.48 % change on previous year 55.31 % change on previous year 25.83 % change on previous year Sweden
2000s 9.95 % change on previous year 5.13 % change on previous year 4.83 % change on previous year Hong Kong, China
2010s 47.73 % change on previous year 8.18 % change on previous year 39.55 % change on previous year Hong Kong, China
2020s 132.41 % change on previous year 5.15 % change on previous year 127.26 % change on previous year Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher external balance on goods and services (current us$), annual growth, Hong Kong, China or Sweden?
Hong Kong, China, at -22.18 % change on previous year against -22.45 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2025.
What is the difference in external balance on goods and services (current us$), annual growth between Hong Kong, China and Sweden?
0.27 % change on previous year, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Sweden?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Sweden rank globally for external balance on goods and services (current us$), annual growth?
Hong Kong, China ranks 134th and Sweden ranks 135th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Sweden: External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/external-balance-on-goods-and-services-current-us-annual-growth-rate/hong-kong-sar-china/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/external-balance-on-goods-and-services-current-us-annual-growth-rate/hong-kong-sar-china/sweden/">Hong Kong, China vs Sweden: External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 8,628 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in External balance on goods and services (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.