Rwanda vs Somalia: Exports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre

Rwanda
165.02 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Somalia
104.24 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
22nd
Somalia rank
25th

Exports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • Somalia
050.0M100.0M150.0M196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 165.02 million current LCU per square kilometre against 104.24 million current LCU per square kilometre in Somalia, a difference of 60.78 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.6 times Somalia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 22nd and Somalia ranks 25th of 190 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Somalia Difference Ahead
1960s 40,267 current LCU per square kilometre 424.81 current LCU per square kilometre 39,842 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 272,977 current LCU per square kilometre 1,395 current LCU per square kilometre 271,582 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 615,392 current LCU per square kilometre 18,812 current LCU per square kilometre 596,580 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 472,096 current LCU per square kilometre 271,256 current LCU per square kilometre 200,840 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 47.43 million current LCU per square kilometre 36.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.48 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 113.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 73.34 million current LCU per square kilometre 39.66 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre, Rwanda or Somalia?
Rwanda, at 165.02 million current LCU per square kilometre against 104.24 million current LCU per square kilometre in Somalia as of 2023.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre between Rwanda and Somalia?
60.78 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Somalia?
42 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Somalia rank globally for exports of goods and services (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 22nd and Somalia ranks 25th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Exports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Somalia: Exports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/somalia-fed-rep/">Rwanda vs Somalia: Exports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports of goods and services (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,496 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Exports of goods and services (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.